--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de ReqView? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de ReqView gracias a Capterra Chile. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ReqView - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Chile 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [ReqView](/software/145388/reqview) # ReqView Canonical: https://www.capterra.cl/software/145388/reqview Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.cl/software/145388/reqview?page=2) > Herramienta de gestión de requisitos de software y sistemas para que los clientes de sectores regulados puedan cumplir con los estándares de ingeniería de sistemas. > > Veredicto: 49 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.6/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa ReqView? Gestión de requisitos de software y sistemas para entidades que deben cumplir con requisitos. Los clientes de sectores regulados confían en ReqView para cumplir con los estándares críticos de seguridad. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.6/5** | 49 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.1/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Eccam - **Constitución**: 2004 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: EUR 430,00 - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Alemania, Australia, Brasil, Canadá, Chequia, China, Estados Unidos, India, Japón, México, Reino Unido ## Funciones - Gestión de la conformidad - Gestión del cambio - Priorización ## Integraciones (en total: 11) - Apache Subversion - Bitbucket - Enterprise Architect - GitHub - GitLab - IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Polarion REQUIREMENTS - Windchill ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [Software para gestión informática](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.cl/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.cl/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.cl/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 4. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.cl/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.cl/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Try ReqView\!" — 5.0/5 > **Benjamin** | *25 de agosto de 2025* | Diseño | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Helpful to organize reqs, risks and other stuff. Straightforward setup and customizable. Good options. Great for smaller organizations that can't afford a huge IT overhead and maintenance for more complex products. > > **Puntos en contra**: Minimal free access for other users. Main issue is commenting. Need to be able to have a large number of users have access to leave comments. This would be really helpful. Also - simultaneous access for comments (at least leaving their own, not deleting or responding). Other small issues - slow loading and unlocking, could be easier to copy paste cells into other rows/requirements (especially tracing links). > > It has been good. They are responsive to requests, add features we ask for overtime, and it helps us collaborate. It will only get better I think. I would recommend to any small to medium org that needs a simple tracing/req/risk management systems. Massively better than Excel or other handcrafted systems. ----- ### "Lightweight and Capable Requirements Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Tolgahan** | *7 de agosto de 2025* | Aviación y aeroespacial | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: ReqView is very lightweight and fast to use. UI feels modern and fresh and very intuitive. Recently added scaling options make reading on high DPI screens very comfortable. > > **Puntos en contra**: No out-of box solution for traceability link coherence/baselining if the linked documents are split into multiple git repositories. > > We are using ReqView as a replacement to Doors Classic. While it is not (yet) a drop in replacement due to some missing functionality, ReqView was flexible enough to let us integrate it into our workflow. Customer support is stellar, they are very responsive, friendly and do their best to find solutions for reported issues. Dev team also seem very capable solving reported issues in a timely manner. ----- ### "Good value for money with great support but still some work to be done on the tool" — 4.0/5 > **Nazar** | *5 de marzo de 2026* | Aerolíneas/aviación | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Very fast responses from the support team with actual helpful advices. The software is very custom and anyone can tailor it to their needs instead of trying to fit in into the existing framework. Clear roadmap of features to be introduced, the product is constantly improving. It is a good value for money, though. > > **Puntos en contra**: There are some features for collaboration that are missing, which prevent us from multiple people using the tool at its maximum capacity ----- ### "Review by Albert" — 3.0/5 > **Albert** | *4 de noviembre de 2022* | Fabricación de ferrocarriles | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The capability to make traceability between documents and projects in a very efficient way. > > **Puntos en contra**: The most critical of the SW to me is the 'CNTRl+Z' command does not exist. ----- ### "Loaded with features for a very reasonable price" — 5.0/5 > **Alexandre** | *12 de diciembre de 2024* | Aviación y aeroespacial | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The company enhance the product based on user's feedback and needs. The tool is lightweight, no brainer to deploy and maintain. Easy integration with Jira or other tools. The support I received was excellent. Different flexible types of licensing. Affordable. Round trip update from Jira\! Possible to work with distributed teams/tiers (document exchange). > > **Puntos en contra**: Indentation when moving requirements across section could be difficult, but with practice it is easier. > > User since 2020 something. Worked in the past with IBM/Jama/R4J (...) and I have to hard time finding out what ReqView is missing compared to those tools, given my experience is mainly in stringent domains (Aero/military). ----- Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.cl/software/145388/reqview?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.cl/software/145388/reqview) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados