--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Miro? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Miro gracias a Capterra Chile. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Miro - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Chile 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de colaboración](/directory/15/collaboration/software) > [Miro](/software/128955/miro) # Miro Canonical: https://www.capterra.cl/software/128955/miro Página: 1 de 68\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.cl/software/128955/miro?page=2) > Una de las principales plataformas de pizarra compartida online en la que los equipos hacen su trabajo. > > Veredicto: 1680 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.7/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Miro? Empresas de software (diseñadores UX/de interfaz de usuario, entrenadores de metodología ágil, propietarios/gerentes de productos), servicios de diseño gráfico y web, agencias de marketing y publicidad, industrias creativas, consultoría ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.7/5** | 1680 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Miro - **Ubicación**: San Francisco, EE. UU. - **Constitución**: 2011 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: US$10,00 - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: español, francés, inglés, japonés, neerlandés, portugués - **Países disponibles**: Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Belice, Bermudas, Bielorrusia y 156 más ## Funciones - Acceso móvil - Almacenamiento de documentos - Arrastrar y soltar - Biblioteca de componentes - Calendario de marketing - Canvas digital - Chat en tiempo real - Chat en vivo - Clasificación de ideas - Configuración de flujos de trabajo - Creación de diagramas - Creación de informes/análisis - Creación de mockups - Creación de prototipos - Creación de wireframes - Diseño y modelado del proceso - Editor para arrastrar y soltar - Gestión de asignaciones - Gestión de calendario - Gestión de contenidos - Gestión de datos - Gestión de la comunicación - Gestión de proyectos - Gestión del conocimiento - Gestión del diseño - Goal Setting/Tracking - Herramientas de colaboración - Herramientas de croquis y anotaciones - Hoja de ruta del producto - Ideation - Lluvia de ideas - Mapas mentales - Modelado visual - Modelos personalizables - Organigrama de programación - Panel de control personalizable - Personalización - Planificación en sprint - Planificación y programación de proyectos - Priorización - Programación - Seguimiento de creación de informes y proyectos - Seguimiento del tiempo - Sincronización en tiempo real - Software de asistencia remota - Supervisión KPI - Task Editing - Tests de usabilidad - Visualización - Visualización de datos … y 85 características más ## Integraciones (en total: 45) - Adobe Creative Cloud - Adobe XD - Airtable - Asana - Axure - BetterCloud - Bitium - Box - ClickUp - Coda - Confluence - Dialpad AI Meetings - Evernote Teams - Figma - Freshdesk … y 30 integraciones más ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de colaboración](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Herramientas de colaboración](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [Herramientas de comunicación interna](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/31014/internal-communications/software) - [Software de administración de ideas](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/10027/idea-management/software) - [Software de pizarra blanca](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/31995/whiteboard/software) - [Software para reuniones](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/30802/meeting/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.cl/software/168389/google-workspace) — 4.7/5 (17483 reviews) 2. [Slack](https://www.capterra.cl/software/135003/slack) — 4.7/5 (24046 reviews) 3. [Zoom Workplace](https://www.capterra.cl/software/144037/zoom-video-conferencing) — 4.6/5 (14526 reviews) 4. [Asana](https://www.capterra.cl/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13547 reviews) 5. [Trello](https://www.capterra.cl/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23487 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Miro, una herramienta visualmente colaborativa y estratégica" — 5.0/5 > **Fiorella** | *24 de enero de 2024* | Comercio y desarrollo internacional | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Lo que más me ha gustado de Miro, es que tiene una interfaz intuitiva que facilita el aprendizaje rápido. Es increíble cómo se puede gestionar un proyecto, sin importar el área geográfica en donde se encuentren los miembros del equipo. La parte visual me encanta, porque tiene muchas herramientas para armar tu proyecto, imágenes, pos-it, diagramas ; etc., es muy colorida. > > **Puntos en contra**: Lo que menos me ha gustado, es que a veces se presentan problemas de rendimiento en documentos grandes. También otra posible desventaja sería que solo funciona cuando hay una conexión a Internet. ----- ### "Smart choice for Project Management" — 4.0/5 > **Shrishail** | *3 de marzo de 2026* | Muebles | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Miro offers strong value for money, especially for teams needing a flexible collaborative whiteboard, though larger plans can be pricey. Customer support is responsive with solid documentation, but live help can be slow at peak times. The platform scores high on ease of use, with intuitive drag-and-drop tools and templates that reduce the learning curve. Organizational management features like team spaces and permissions help keep boards structured, while meetings feel more engaging with real-time co-editing and presentation modes. Workflow management integrates well with tools like Jira and Asana, making task tracking smoother. Overall navigation is clean and logical, though very large boards can occasionally feel cluttered. > > **Puntos en contra**: It gives the ready made templates for workflows, inbuilt AI features, and endless whiteboard. important is value for money. > > Wonderful experience in terms of project management, visual roadmap.It makes team collaboration, brainstorming, and meetings more interactive and organized. The interface is user-friendly, and real-time editing keeps everyone aligned. Overall, it’s a reliable and efficient tool for visual project management. ----- ### "The fun yet professional organizational tool" — 4.0/5 > **Orest** | *15 de marzo de 2026* | Productos químicos | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: What I most enjoyed of Miro is that it turned out really fun and easy to use for making mental maps, flowcharts and diagrams. It helps automatizing the creation of these tools, because it’s a big dashboard without space limits, and you just need to add the elements you want without worrying about the space limit (if it’s going to be too small or too big). It’s also very collaborative, which is something’s that stands out when you got to work with groups of coworkers; it has been a game changer for me and my peers when it comes to teamwork and organizing our works and projects. It feels fun, chill, but professional at the same time. The navigation in the platform is fast and intuitive; you don’t need to type much to find what you want. Talking about the elements, I was thrilled when I saw the variety of cool things (Colorful post-its, arrows, pie charts, bar charts, etc) you can add to make the dashboard more organized and easier to digest. Loved that\! > > **Puntos en contra**: For the cons, the one that stood out the most for me, is that the free version doesn’t let me create more than 3 dashboards at the same time, because when I need to open many dashboards for the big projects, then I need to use another tool or just try to adjust to the limit it is giving me, and it’s not really comfortable. > > I’d describe my overall experience as good. It does have it’s disadvantages, such as the limit on dashboards and the small number of free templates, but it also has many advantages that make virtual teamwork easier and faster. Once you get the hang of it, it becomes a very useful and even fun tool\! ----- ### "Miro is a great way to visualize" — 3.0/5 > **Allen** | *2 de diciembre de 2025* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 5.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Miro can be an awesome tool for visualizing ideas and organizing thoughts. The features and plugins are great and the support from the customer support team has been great as well. > > **Puntos en contra**: Once you're in Miro, your data is kind of trapped in the application. There are ways to export but there are size limits on exporting. What makes it more difficult is that there is no way to track the overall size of your board while you're designing it so when it comes time to export, I find myself breaking things into many smaller boards or frames. If we knew this before trying Miro, we probably would have looked into alternatives. Now we feel stuck. > > Miro has been great for visualizing things for our customers. We have had some really great meetings due to Miro. When looking at this from a forward looking perspective though, Miro becomes a challenge to data security and data retention. ----- ### "Easy to use whiteboarding and charting tool with some administrative limitations" — 4.0/5 > **Matt** | *4 de enero de 2026* | Gestión de organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It is very easy to use. The click and drag interface and the templated actions make visualising data and concepts easy. It is also easy to share and collaborate with others. The free licence tier makes it easy for others to join in. > > **Puntos en contra**: Though the data in flowcharts and mind maps are in a structured hierarchy, Miro does not export the data in that structure. Especially for csv the data comes out in one column and in the order in which it was added to Miro, which is illogical. Items on the board that cross each other or overlap are difficult to work with as the item you want might be buried behind other items. Miro operates its layers like Powerpoint, which is equally difficult to use. I find myself sending foreground items to the back multiple times to get to the item I want. Miro is only two dimensional. In my mind maps I want to be able to provide more information about an item in the map but the only way to do that is to create another label or postit note. I would love to be able to provide depth to an item where someone could hover and read a description of that item. Also, from an administrators perspective Miro only makes content created by my organisation visible to me in the enterprise tier, which is expensive. I cannot see what my staff are doing in Miro, therefore handing over from one employee to another is very difficult. > > Miro has been a solid tool overall. It’s easy to use, makes it simple to visualise ideas using templates and drag-and-drop, and it’s great for sharing and collaborating. We’ve used it effectively to scope a CRM build and to map out requirements in a way that’s easy for others to understand. The main downsides are that structured diagrams don’t export in a useful hierarchy, overlapping items can be painful to work with because of the layers, and it would be better if you could add more detail to items without cluttering the board. ----- Página: 1 de 68\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.cl/software/128955/miro?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.cl/software/128955/miro) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Datos estructurados