--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de TestCafe? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de TestCafe gracias a Capterra Chile. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: TestCafe - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Chile 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de automatización de pruebas](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [TestCafe](/software/156970/testcafe) # TestCafe Canonical: https://www.capterra.cl/software/156970/testcafe > Una solución completa de node.js para probar aplicaciones web. Arnés de prueba completo que no necesita complementos de navegador. > > Veredicto: 2 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.5/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.5/5** | 2 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 5.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 3.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 5.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 3.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: DevExpress - **Constitución**: 1998 ## Contexto comercial - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) (Prueba gratis) - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Estados Unidos ## Funciones - Admite la ejecución en paralelo ## Opciones de asistencia - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de automatización de pruebas](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Browserling](https://www.capterra.cl/software/147028/browserling) — 3.0/5 (5 reviews) 2. [beSTORM](https://www.capterra.cl/software/107198/bestorm) (0 reviews) 3. [Omnium Lite](https://www.capterra.cl/software/186561/omnium-lite) (0 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Free open source but need js background to use it" — 5.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *3 de mayo de 2018* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: easy setup - takes around couple hours. No maintenance necessary. Write in JS. Import modern popular frameworks: react, vue. Almost anyone can write the test as long as you know JS. Documentation is robust enough to get going. Community support is responsive. Hooks with browser stack and can run multiple browsers on command line. > > **Puntos en contra**: Popup occurs on same browser. Some limitations and there's no workaround. Screen capture is sorta weak > > easy to develop your test scripts and get running ----- ### "Simple tool for frontend testing" — 4.0/5 > **Piotr** | *7 de junio de 2022* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 6.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: TestCafe is extremely easy to set up and use. If a user is familiar with JS/TS and has some experience in automation testing - there won't be a problem with adapting this tool to the application. There is no need to install external web drivers or any plugins. After TC is installed, everything is ready to run. Parallelization is native and simple to run. Just a couple of parameters defining the whole process need to be set up. All basic functionalities are included in the framework, e.g. headed/headless mode, multiple browsers, retries, screenshots, and videos on fail, etc. - the whole testing can be adjusted to needs. Automatic async/await are working well. > > **Puntos en contra**: To tell the truth, TestCafe was unstable. Not always, but it has some bugs and problems. Freezing without any reason during execution that previously was successful was happening quite often. Sometimes, errors seemed to be appearing without any reason and their explanation/messages were generic, without detailed description. Another disadvantage is a little documentation. Some parts of the framework are documented poorly or not documented at all - especially more complicated features. Debugging can sometimes be painful, as I said before, generic errors appearing "randomly" could be exhausting. Problematic selector defining was not a good addition to tedious debugging. Selectors were sometimes not found/hidden/overlapped. To avoid these errors it is needed to create redundant selector definitions to make sure that TestCafe won't get lost during the execution. The last thing, that is quite serious is - REST API testing is hard, complicated, and not natively supported. Some external library needs to be installed to have it covered. > > All in all, I was using TestCafe for over one year, and to be honest, I am not a fan of it. It has had its ups and downs, but sometimes results of the execution depend "on the mood of the higher powers". Despite its good sides, like parallelization or ease of use, it has some serious disadvantages that can really influence the reliability of testing. On the market, there are a lot of better and more comprehensive tools for automation e.g. Cypress or Playwright. ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.cl/software/156970/testcafe) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Datos estructurados