--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Continuity2? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Continuity2 gracias a Capterra Chile. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Continuity2 - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Chile 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Sistemas de gestión de continuidad de negocio](/directory/30206/business-continuity/software) > [Continuity2](/software/160740/bcms2) # Continuity2 Canonical: https://www.capterra.cl/software/160740/bcms2 Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.cl/software/160740/bcms2?page=2) > Software de BCM (gestión de continuidad empresarial, por sus siglas en inglés) diseñado para brindar alivio y ayuda con la gestión diaria de los requisitos de continuidad empresarial de las organizaciones. > > Veredicto: 18 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.3/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Continuity2? Este software es utilizado por las organizaciones más grandes del mundo en diversos sectores, tales como finanzas, inversión, servicios públicos, telecomunicaciones, sector público, autoridades locales, entre muchos más. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.3/5** | 18 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 3.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.7/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Continuity2 - **Ubicación**: Glasgow, RU - **Constitución**: 2002 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: GBP 20.000,00 - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: alemán, checo, croata, español, húngaro, inglés, italiano, neerlandés, polaco, portugués, rumano, sueco, árabe - **Países disponibles**: Alemania, Australia, Brasil, Canadá, China, Estados Unidos, Guernesey, India, Irlanda, Isla de Man, Japón, Jersey, México, Reino Unido ## Funciones - Almacenamiento seguro de datos - Evaluación de riesgos - Gestión de incidentes - Gestión de tareas - Recuperación de desastres ## Integraciones (en total: 3) - Jira - SAP Business One - Zendesk Suite ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Sistemas de gestión de continuidad de negocio](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/30206/business-continuity/software) ## Alternativas 1. [EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard](https://www.capterra.cl/software/188155/easeus-data-recovery) — 4.6/5 (411 reviews) 2. [IDrive](https://www.capterra.cl/software/171884/idrive) — 4.6/5 (1200 reviews) 3. [NAKIVO Backup & Replication](https://www.capterra.cl/software/161328/nakivo) — 4.8/5 (457 reviews) 4. [VMware Cloud Director Availability](https://www.capterra.cl/software/1014046/vmware-cloud-director-availability) — 4.8/5 (81 reviews) 5. [Cove Data Protection](https://www.capterra.cl/software/163343/backup-and-recovery) — 4.7/5 (217 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Business Continuity" — 4.0/5 > **Rohan** | *14 de diciembre de 2018* | Aerolíneas/aviación | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: There are many pros to the use of C2 for IATA for our business continuity. The layout is quite good, and one is able to understand the various logo once using it. The actual functionalities are amazing, the ability to call the customers and clients and team members. And the ability to have users involved that are not part of the system. What is also amazing is the support team and the quick response times. > > **Puntos en contra**: Some fields are editable by many parties, hence data duplication or mistakes can occur easily. This is caused by open text fields. Some icons are confusing in understanding and some fields require some asterisks or 'i' for further information (explanations of why or what the field means). > > The c2 tool we have been using at IATA has been great so far. More updates and time needs to be spent on updating it but overall we are very satisfied. The customer support is amazing. ----- ### "C2 implementation and use" — 4.0/5 > **Harry** | *23 de noviembre de 2018* | Marketing y publicidad | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It is important to start with, ‘what you put in is what you will get out’. C2 is a structured approach to BIA formulation to Plan completion, the more detail, time and effort you apply, the better the resulting Plan output. Work at the outset is required to ensure that you recognise how C2 functions as this will help you formulate the organisational structure. Once you have completed the initial ground work, C2 is very easy to add, remove and modify the structure to meet the requirements of the Plan you intend to use within your organisation. One of the things I like about this application is the simplistic dashboard. The front end appears from sign-on and this can be tailored to suit user needs, so they only see what they need to see. Another key benefit is the provision of additional functionality that supports the Plans during validation and invocation. The benefit of having one system that can be configured to suit organisational complexity, provide Plan governance, has the ability to communicate to all Plan members, additional internal and external stakeholders using SMS, e-mail and forced voice call is a real plus. > > **Puntos en contra**: There are not many downsides to the C2 software, but one area that does cause functionality frustration, is organisational BIA. This function is great if you have an organisation that does the same activity multiple times over multiple locations. However, if this is not the case, the organisational BIA will apply constraints when trying to make organisation structure changes, removing departments, activities etc. requiring the user to modify the organisational BIA structure in order to complete a front end structure change. The ability to interface with other business systems, such as Active Directory would also benefit the application so that users do not have to remember multiple login details. However, password security can be configured to meet the needs of the business, but this would act as a separate instance. > > In my view there are two typical approaches to Business Continuity Management and planning: • Document incident-response resources and the procedures that explain what to do, how to do it and whom to notify. • Implement BCMS software to assist in the design, implementation and enduring control of the BCMS. Within a typical BCMS, the documentation approach has been the traditional plan-building method. This method involves significant resource gathering input from the business units on which systems and operations are critical, compiling a business impact analysis, an incident response plan, call lists, and recovery solutions and procedures. This normally resides on the shared drive ready for stakeholder use. Continity2 controls the analysis and planning process. When fully implemented, all of Business Continuity and Incident Management people, resources and business needs will be represented as data elements and stored within software’s database. The creation of Plan templates, management of contacts and BCMS governance has been a real benefit. For a global organisation, delivering a consistent methodology and approach with uniformed Plan delivery demonstrates to our external interested parties that we have a Global BCMS, not a desperate system based on out of date analysis and documentation. ----- ### "Your typical user" — 3.0/5 > **Lynsey** | *13 de mayo de 2019* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It is compliant to ISO22301 and the customer care is exceptional. it is everything you need in "one box". > > **Puntos en contra**: Complicated initially to set up and there have been regular changes within the software, that has caused confusion. I now understand that this is because request from other user have been implemented but no new release notes have been issued. > > The build of the system was more difficult than initially anticipated. With the changes happening within the software, this has caused confusion and a cause of user confidence lacking. C2 as a company is very supportive and will do everything they can to ensure their customers have what they need to use the software and without this, I would have struggled, more than I did. ----- ### "C2 BCMS Review" — 5.0/5 > **Paul** | *20 de febrero de 2019* | Seguros | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The software is easy to use and has built in help if you are not clear on what is required in any particular field It provides many different layers of reporting should you require in depth reporting and governance capability People signing off the plans do not need to have direct system access, cutting down the number of potential user accounts you need to create and administer > > **Puntos en contra**: Sometimes you have to do a manual push to update the plan when making amendments for the amendments to be transferred to the plan (this being reviewed though and believe it to be resolved during next software release). Current limited capability on the 'Invoke' button of the BCP The call tree cascades show the message coming from a UK mobile when sending outside of the UK, this means there is a potential for people to see it as 'spam' and not read the message (this is being extremely picky) None of the above are major issues and would not stop me from recommending the software > > The benefits being realised are mass cascade very quickly, automated reporting through upfront testing criteria and the ability to auto send plan review/signoff emails. ----- ### "Benefits of a C2 BCMS" — 5.0/5 > **Derek** | *11 de abril de 2019* | Automoción | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Solution is very good at capturing all the business requirements and impacts then pulling them through to both the individual business area and location BCP's. Ability to tailor the BIA/BCP template requirements to meet the business needs. Having introduced the BCMS to the business functions, they embraced the solution after the initial concerns around navigation. > > **Puntos en contra**: The annual reviews whilst automatically generated to the plan authors/owners need to be independently tracked and managed by the System Admin from an overview standpoint. The email review notifications are pretty simple and we have struggled to get company branding added, this has resulted in mails being deleted as the plain text looks like spam. > > With multiple (50+) plans across the business, the management, review and updates have always been problematic with business areas wanting to put there own emphasis on specific elements. Having a fixed format recording method across the organisation has forced the standardisation and enabled the assessment of criticality of functions. ----- Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.cl/software/160740/bcms2?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.cl/software/160740/bcms2) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Datos estructurados