--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de IronMQ? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de IronMQ gracias a Capterra Chile. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: IronMQ - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Chile 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software para desarrollo de apps](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [IronMQ](/software/182241/ironmq) # IronMQ Canonical: https://www.capterra.cl/software/182241/ironmq Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.cl/software/182241/ironmq?page=2) > La cola de mensajes elástica y muy escalable proporciona un sistema de paso de mensajes sumamente rápido y robusto con implementaciones flexibles. > > Veredicto: 26 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.3/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa IronMQ? IronMQ es altamente flexible en términos de implementación y escalabilidad, por lo que los clientes van desde pequeñas y medianas empresas hasta compañías de la lista Fortune 50. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.3/5** | 26 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 3.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 70% | (7/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Iron.io - **Ubicación**: Las Vegas, EE. UU. - **Constitución**: 2014 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: US$24,99 - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Alemania, Australia, Brasil, Canadá, China, Estados Unidos, India, Japón, México, Reino Unido ## Funciones - API ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Asistencia 24/7 ## Categoría - [Software para desarrollo de apps](https://www.capterra.cl/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Salesforce Platform](https://www.capterra.cl/software/164356/app-cloud) — 4.4/5 (392 reviews) 2. [Rayven](https://www.capterra.cl/software/173908/rayven-industrial-business-intelligence) — 5.0/5 (24 reviews) 3. [Domo](https://www.capterra.cl/software/119119/domo) — 4.3/5 (329 reviews) 4. [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.capterra.cl/software/130185/anypoint-platform) — 4.4/5 (573 reviews) 5. [eLegere](https://www.capterra.cl/software/217814/elegere) — 4.5/5 (38 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Efficiency is the name of the game" — 5.0/5 > **Ryan** | *15 de febrero de 2019* | Internet | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: We run a pretty lean startup and need to offload as much development operations as possible. We looked at AWS of course and discovered IronMQ to be the right balance of functionality, ease-of-use, and cost. The Worker and MessageQueue products are particularly top-notch. > > **Puntos en contra**: It was difficult to migrate off of our existing infrastructure but the team at Iron tried hard to ease the pain. There's probably no way around it. Not everything will transfer seamlessly but we were able to do it with minimal downtime. > > We process millions of jobs a month and needed a way to scale outside of running our own Sidekiq instance. Worker and MessageQueue were the team that solved it for us. ----- ### "Set up a push queue in few minutes" — 5.0/5 > **Jose** | *15 de febrero de 2019* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Very easy to set up projects, queues, subscribers. Good value for money. > > **Puntos en contra**: The company seems to be quite focused on IronWorker and the product plans do not contemplate a low-volume case when you just need a cloud-hosted push queue server to distribute amongs subscribers. Documentation on local setup with Docker is limited. > > We needed a cloud-hosted push queue to distribute work across several worker nodes that we were hosting and ironMQ was the perfect solution. The Node.js sdk allowed us to set up very quickly the necessary code to send the jobs requests, and then you just need to set up your queue to push your messages to these subscribed workers. Another feature we liked was the availability of some Docker images that mimicked the authentication and queue behaviour for testing locally. We've used extensively in our docker-compose stacks. ----- ### "Evaluate with great caution and care before committing" — 2.0/5 > **Ezekiel** | *15 de febrero de 2019* | Internet | Valoración de la recomendación: 0.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: - Signed up on a free plan - Integrated easily with Heroku > > **Puntos en contra**: - Randomly lost queues several times during THEIR outages - Very slow performance - Horrible support; sometimes WEEKS without response - Horrible documentation -- out of date, incomplete, etc. - Minimal feature set -- not even close to competitors - Terrible, buggy UI online > > IronMQ at the time was the simplest integration for our small PHP Laravel app on Heroku. We are still stuck on it despite having grown significantly. Even when we were small we faced myriad horrible technical issues that should never happen with any production 3rd party service -- loss of data, frequent outages, god awful performance, buggy UI causing you to have to revert to your own API usage for simple queue management tasks, etc. I would never put it past a company to improve over time so I won't just tell you to run away as fast as you can, but SERIOUSLY if you ever are actually considering using Iron or someone tries to convince you to use it, you should be prepared to justify that decision against very mature, very serious competition at this point. Queuing is more or less a solved problem including managed solutions in the cloud; Iron doesn't hold a candle to the competition at this point in time. ----- ### "IronMQ let us quickly get to solving the problems that really mattered for our company" — 5.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *15 de febrero de 2019* | Hostelería | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: IronMQ was simple to implement in our system. We use it for a number of use cases and find it reliable, fast, and easy to use. > > **Puntos en contra**: I can't think of any specific issue we've had with IronMQ. When we first started we organized things in an awkward way which lead to a large number of projects appearing on the dashboard when logging into Iron. That was mostly our own fault though. ----- ### "Interaction with go driver is great\!" — 5.0/5 > **Diego** | *15 de febrero de 2019* | Gestión de inversiones | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: How easy it was to get up and running. At least the Go driver let's you put your config files in several places, following a hierarchy to override one value or another. > > **Puntos en contra**: This will sound like a fake review but my experience was just very good with IronMQ, there wasn't anything I needed that wasn't there. > > I wrote a search engine that had to coordinate several crawlers. I used IronMQ because I didn't want to setup any of the other message queues. I wrote my app in Go, and the go driver to talk to IronMQ was well designed, easy to follow examples on their site. The dashboard gives you enough info to debug any issues. Really good experience. ----- Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.cl/software/182241/ironmq?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.cl/software/182241/ironmq) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Datos estructurados